2005-09-29
god-man strikes!
and just for reference, here's a little info on HR-6341
H.R.6341 SPONSOR: Rep Bingham (introduced 01/30/80) A bill to amend title V of the Social Security Act to require States to provide women access to their obstetric medical records and current information on obstetrical procedures, to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require the dissemination of information on the effects and risks of drugs and devices on the health of pregnant and parturient women and of prospective and developing children, and to provide for a study on the delayed long-term effect on child development of obstetrical drugs and procedures administered to or used by pregnant and parturient women.had to go way back for that one, but makes it all the better.
one nation under god?
2005-09-27
monkey trial: part deux
The case for intelligent design was argued by three lawyers from the Thomas More Legal Center, a Christian foundation founded by Thomas Monaghan, a Roman Catholic multimillionaire and founder of the Domino's Pizza chain. In his opening statement yesterday, Pat Gillan, the lead attorney for the defense, argued that the case is "about freedom in education, not about a religious agenda."first, purely random, comment... interesting that the founder of Domino's Pizza is involved in all this (or at least his foundation anyway). more seriously, the bit about it being for freedom in education is just total bullshit. because if we're just going to allow any crackpot theory to be taught in schools "for freedom," then i can't wait to hear when the Flying Spaghetti Monster is taught.
Secular science has won all the big legal battles since then, but not the struggle for American minds. In an echo of the Scopes trial, some of the Dover parents involved in the case were recently mocked at a local fair by opponents who performed a monkey dance around them.the people that mocked them with the "monkey dance," in my opinion, just show how closely related we are to monkeys. otherwise, why would they engage in such a foolish action? why not fling poo on them? sometimes it just hurts to find out the level of ignorance in the world...
pounding pork at my desk
2005-09-26
another great POE post
2005-09-23
you think they'd learn
but really, it's about time. cause we definitely need to "eliminate state grants for safe and drug-free schools because 'studies show that schools are among the safest places in the country and relatively drug free.'" and if you're poor and get pregnant, well you should learn to keep your legs closed missy cause we ain't got no "teen funding [for the] portion of Title X, which provides 'free and reduced-price contraceptives, including the IUD, the injection drug Depo-Provera, and the morning-after pill' to poor teenagers."
hurray for democracy! helping keep the rich rich and the poor even poorer...
2005-09-22
Phil Donahue vs Bill O'Reilly
what about jboss?
2005-09-21
teen vice research
Sex and drugs hit girls harder. to me these findings seem fairly obvious, but i also disagree with Halfors' statement that depression wouldn't lead to drug use. the way i see things, it's a cyclic factor. depression -> drug use -> depression. yes, some jump the first curve and the drug use leads to depression, but i'd wager to guess as many use drugs to "self medicate" as she said.
as for the findings that engaging in these activities increases the likelihood of depression, again i'd say it's pretty apparent to anyone that knows teenagers or remembers their own experiences. it's a tough time to go through, and adding in extra variables like sex and drug use can only complicate matters. not to mention the fact that their bodies are rapidly changing to begin with, the new complicated emotions brought on by sexual activity, as well as the experience of alcohol/drug use (not to mention their physical effects), would obviously impact development.
i'm not trying to belittle these findings any, as they may be able to influence people to provide more sex, drug and alcohol education (not likely in the current administration), but it seems to me to only prove what i'd say most people already know. and that, maybe, the findings shouldn't be written up in such a manor as to seemingly provoke conflict.
2005-09-20
google threatens democracy?
Google Earth threatens democracy
Google Earth threatens democracy - again
just a couple funny little displays of technology in use.
intelligent idiocy
Challenged by Creationists, Museums Answer Back. I know it goes against what this article is saying, but I find it very upsetting and even depressing that we need a "cottage industry" to pop up teaching museum docents how to respond to critics of evolution. Maybe I could understand this happening back before Scopes, but certainly not in this "modern" age of science and technology.
Apparently I'm wrong since the NY Times has an entire section devoted to The Evolution Debate. I just don't understand how people can be so willfully ignorant; willing to accept science on some issues, but choosing to debase it in others where it challenges their faith. Just boggles the mind. I believe everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but when there is such strong evidence for one side versus another with none I don't see how you can choose the other. Show Me the Science. After reading this wonderfully written refutation of "intelligent design," if one can still support it I'd like to know.
gay marriage allowed = animal + human marriage?
anyway, the real point is that people need to realize gay marriage isn't going to bring about some crazy marrying your pet spree. and mature and have an open mind, but that's probably asking too much.
Bird brains
But surely the penguin is only one of God's works. Earth also has Bonobo chimps, whose jaw-dropping sexual athleticism would make Hugh Hefner blush; well-fed cats that cruelly toy with their prey; and praying mantises that eat their spouses. How do we know that these creatures do not point The Way? We don't, therefore we should remember the words of the film company executive responsible for March of the Penguins: 'You know what? They're just birds.'The NYTimes linking to this on their editorial page seems to be the only good to come out of their new NYT Select program... damn them for taking my beloved Maureen Dowd from me.
sometimes it just hurts
2005-09-19
OK, Fine. It's the Apocalypse
Pre-Inquisition Conservatives are proudly hawking the notion that dinosaurs and blue-eyed white guys were holding bake sales together 5,000 years ago. Because it's not enough to merely believe God created the universe -- he also specifically planted an entire false history of the universe to screw with you, you sodomy-loving, DNA-believing-in, post-Newtonian bastards. You just wait, we're only a few months away from digging up an authentic handcrafted dinosaur saddle that will prove that at least one prehistoric Big 5 Sporting Goods Store survived the Biblical flood. Presuming you're among the Pre-Inquisition Conservatives who acknowledge the existence of dinosaurs at all, mind you -- and if you are, the rest of the non-believing-in-dinosaurs movement hereby condemns you for falling for another of God's devious nature-based soul mousetraps: yep, you're going to Hell.makes me laugh and cry at the same time because i (sadly) know people who honestly believe that fossils are just one, of many, of the devil's tricks... so sad.
tmw
2005-09-16
"i take responsibility" - bush
my favorite bit is at the end: "I take responsibility for having failed to say 'I take responsibility' for anything until it was politically expedient to do so. I take responsibility for being such an arrogant, cranky, vindictive twit that my loyal aides have to draw straws to see which unlucky one has to bring me a reality check. I take responsibility for putting myself in the position of being elected to the most powerful position in the world knowing full well that I have neither the experience, the imagination nor the human compassion that is a prerequisite for the job."
2005-09-15
katrina compare/contrast
2005-09-14
some people make me sick
The people that spew this ignorant filth, and those that listen and believe it, have serious problems. To use God's name for such tragic events, implying it is His will for such-and-such to happen because of
How they can claim that a supposed loving, caring "God" could not only allow, but purposefully target, something like Katrina is beyond me. Yes, the God of the Old Testament is wrathful and vengeful, but that's not what they've been preaching since Christ came. It's all about "love thy neighbor," or at least it should be. But how can you claim to love your neighbor, but hate another for simplying being the wrong race, religion or sexual orientation? To paraphrase one of my favorite quotes from Saved!, "If God made us all, and we're all so different, how can that be wrong?" Something I'll never understand I guess, and why I'm not a big fan of the whole organized religion school of thought. To each their own, I guess, but I hope someday they'll open their eyes, minds and hearts to truly accept others.
abs for freedom!
2005-09-13
sometimes knowing things makes me mad
march of the conservatives
Not all conservatives find the movie a rebuke to Darwin's theory. "If an Intelligent Designer designed nature," the columnist George F. Will asked recently, "why did it decide to make breeding so tedious for those penguins?"